FLUORIDE INFORMATION AUSTRALIA

FACT AND FICTION   -  OUR FACTS AND GOVERNMENT'S FICTION

 

You will see in this email received by Mr. Savage from Premier of Queensland Ms Bligh's Assistant Mr. Phil Reeves; that it contains  totally opposite information from the Government to that  of what countless  experts from all around the world are saying about silicofluoride S6 poisoning of our water supplies and the staggering Evidence of Harm; and  I allege that this is a fairy story at best,  perjury and criminal negligence at worst.   I'm asking Queenslanders, Australians and world citizens  to study every piece of information on this website  and you will see the true facts;  and compare it to the information below from the Queensland Government and what can only  bring into question is there a  sinister  agenda to do such a thing to the population.

Email as received by Mr. T. Savage     Please quote: MCU    TF/08/16863

Mr T Savage  tksavage@bigpond.net.au

Dear Mr Savage

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the Government’s decision to fluoridate Queensland’s drinking water.  I have been requested to reply to you on the Premier’s behalf.

As you may be aware, the Water Fluoridation Act 2008, which mandates the addition of fluoride to drinking water supplies, was passed by Parliament with bi-partisan support on 13 March 2008.  I am delighted that both side of politics support fluoridation as one of the Bligh Government’s most significant public health initiatives.  In a move which will bring Queensland into line with other States, 80% of Queenslanders will have access to fluoridated drinking water within two years, increasing to 90% by 2012.

Queensland spends more on oral health than any other State or Territory – an estimated $145.1 million in 2007‑2008 alone – yet Queenslanders continue to have some of the worst rates of tooth decay in the nation.  For example, a recent Australian Institute of Health and Welfare national study found that our five to 12 year olds have more tooth decay than their peers in any other State and almost twice the number of fillings of Victorian children of the same age.  The same study found five to 15 year old children from areas with water fluoridation had less tooth decay than children from areas without fluoride added to the drinking water.  This study can be accessed at www.aihw.gov.au.

Our ongoing investment in the provision of quality oral health services is limited in its capacity to make a difference for Queenslanders while a key prevention strategy such as water fluoridation is missing.

Research has demonstrated that fluoridation – together with oral hygiene and good nutrition – can reduce tooth decay by up to 40%.  We cannot ignore the extensive scientific evidence which shows that fluoridation is a safe and effective means of improving oral health, thereby reducing the considerable personal and financial burden of oral disease.  The introduction of water fluoridation will shift the focus to prevention over cure.

This decision is about responding to the very clear wishes of the majority of Queenslanders who support the fluoridation of public water supplies.  Surveys conducted over recent years by the Office of Economic and Statistical Research, the Local Government Association of Queensland, Central Queensland University and the Queensland Oral Health Alliance have consistently demonstrated that between 60% and 70% of Queenslanders support fluoridation.

The Government has long supported water fluoridation as a safe and effective means of combating tooth decay, and is a signatory to the National Oral Health Plan 2004‑2013, a national agreement which sets as a high priority the extension of fluoridation across Australia.  This Plan may be viewed at www.health.vic.gov.au/dentistry/downloads/oralhealth.pdf.

Furthermore, in 2005 the Government established a $6 million program to reimburse councils 100% of the capital cost of fluoridating local drinking water supplies.  Disappointingly, no council took up this offer.  As a result it is now time for the State Government to act. 

Fluoridation is one of the most widely researched public health measures in the world and is endorsed as safe and effective by more than 150 major scientific and medical bodies in Australia and overseas, including the World Health Organisation, the National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Dental Association and the Australian Medical Association.  For example, a recent review of water fluoridation by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia’s peak health research and ethics body, found that water fluoridation is safe and does not cause bone fractures, allergies, cancer or other adverse health effects.  This extensive and rigorous review can be accessed at www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/eh41syn.htm.

Townsville water has been fluoridated since 1964 and every other State and Territory has been drinking fluoridated water for more than 30 years.  There have been no scientifically or medically documented cases involving adverse health effects from consumption of fluoride in Townsville or in interstate jurisdictions.

Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral, and worldwide approximately 360 million people drink water that naturally contains fluoride.  Water fluoridation is not mass medication, but merely topping up the levels of fluoride already found naturally in the water to prevent dental decay.  Drinking fluoridated water stabilises the mineral content of bones and teeth, thus strengthening the outside tooth enamel from decay-causing bacteria.

While the great majority of Queenslanders support fluoridation, this does not prevent the minority within the community who do not wish to receive the benefits of fluoride from accessing alternative sources of water such as tank, bottled or filtered (reverse osmosis) water.  While it is recognised that this will impose a small cost on the minority, this will be far less than the very considerable costs currently borne by the community through excess dental treatment needs.  In addition, recent research has also found that those opposed to water fluoridation tend to already be using alternative drinking water sources, compared to those who support water fluoridation.

The Government’s decision is not intended to disadvantage those opposed to fluoridation, but to satisfy the very clear choice of an overwhelming majority of Queenslanders who wish to access cheap, safe and reliable fluoridated drinking water.

Should you have any queries regarding my advice to you, please refer to the Queensland Health website at www.health.qld.gov.au/fluoride for the facts on water fluoridation.

Yours sincerely   

Phil Reeves MP

Parliamentary Secretary to the Premier of Queensland

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 CALLING GLOBAL REVOLUTION AGAINST SILICOFLUORIDE S6 TOXIC WASTE SOURCED FROM INDUSTRY IN THE  POISONING OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES KNOWN AS 'WATER FLUORIDATION'

SODIUM FLUOROSILICATE SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE ; SODIUM HEXAFLUOROSILICATE ; SODIUM FLUOSILICATE  THIS IS THE TRUTH - S6 POISON TOXIC WASTE SOURCED FROM INDUSTRY PUT IN OUR WATER SUPPLIES BY THE GOVERNMENT

http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter March, 30, 1983 from EPA  U.S.

confirming that the "water fluoridation

chemicals" come from industry toxic waste

sources.

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~rmasters/AHABS/docs/HanmerToRussell.pdf

See this also:-

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~rmasters/AHABS/docs/ThurnauToMasters.pdf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 http://www.garynull.com/documents/Dental/Fluoride/fluoride2.htm

How to Market a Toxic Waste "Fluoride"

 

 

 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The most important document on fluoridation since the 'York Review' - Hampshire County Council rejects fluoridation.

http://www3.hants.gov.uk/fluoridation_report_final_a.pdf

The Report of Hampshire County Council's 'Water Fluoridation Panel' is, in our view, the most important document to have been published on fluoridation in the UK since the York Review

 http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7265/855

It should be on the desk of every Council Leader and Health Scrutiny Committee Member for careful reading and the formulation of policy decisions on any fluoridation proposal.

And in already fluoridated areas, it should form the basis of an immediate review by Councils, with a view to terminating the practice - the Report notes that legal issues raised by UKCAF regarding fluoridation are significant, and need to be resolved as quickly as possible.

http://www.ukcaf.org/science.html

http://www.ukcaf.org/law.html

http://www.ukcaf.org/index.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

And  a reminder to put it altogether:- http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/14/1060588496893.html  SMH article from 2003

extract:   In 2000, Australia recorded the second-worst levels of fillings, missing teeth and cavities among the OECD for 35- to 44-year-olds, while a recent survey found the rate of gum disease has almost doubled among the over-65 population during the past 14 years. (Di comment: yes, much silicofluoride S6 poisoning of Australia’s water supplies already for many years).

Researchers from Westmead Hospital’s Institute of Dental Research also released results of new research last month that showed they had discovered more than 20 new species of the Prevotella bacteria, which reside within decaying human teeth.

The institute’s director, Professor Neil Hunter, says the bacteria, which have the potential to cause a wide range of infections such as sinusitis, pneumonia, meningitis and wound infections, are becoming more prevalent due to public health measures, including water fluoridation.

“Fluoridated teeth have hard shells but they decay and they hollow,” he says. “Fluoride makes the outside of the tooth very hard but they are like a tree - the bark on the outside can appear very hard but the inside can be rotten and you won’t discover this until the tree falls over. (Di comment: yes, this is certainly an admission that “fluoride” is totally ineffective; and we know it’s incredibly dangerous….. ineffective + dangerous.. what we’ve all said all along).

(Di’s further comment:    What ALL Australians need is access to affordable dentistry + oral hygiene guidance AND GET THE SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONS WHICH YOU REFER TO AS “WATER FLUORIDATION” OUT OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES IMMEDIATELY, PERMANENTLY AND IRREVOCABLY.    He continues  "These bacteria invade a tooth when there is a small defect and once they get within the hard surface, there really is not that much stopping them.” end extract

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 FLUORIDE DESTROYS TOOTH ENAMEL – SAYS CHEMISTRY PROFESSOR

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/02/15/fluoride_destroys_tooth_enamel_chemistry_prof.htm

Extract:  Fluoride is being added to drinking water in a number of locations around the world, and in recent months there have been efforts to extend fluoridation of our drinking water, notably in Ireland, the UK, Australia, New Zealand and California.

Dr. Gerard F. Judd, a retired chemistry professor from Purdue University has been warning against the use of fluoride, and he backs up his warning with research and data, as well as an understanding of chemical reactions. His proposals on how to take care of our teeth without the use of fluoride are listed in a comment that was posted on a previous post of mine titled: Fluoride - No Thank You!

Letter from Dr. Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D., Chemist, Researcher for 18 years, Professor of Chemistry for 33 yrs.

April 2002    Dear Government Executive and Employee:

We can all stop spending billions for American dental work and research. Let me tell you why: I have learned the real causes of dental cavities and gum infection. People, including you, will now be able to take care of their own dentistry with insignificant cost, and end with perfect teeth. Cavities and gum infections are ended!

A great amount of REPUTABLE DENTAL RESEARCH proves the following:   please read full article here:-   http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/02/15/fluoride_destroys_tooth_enamel_chemistry_prof.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 SOME MORE ALLEGED CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

World Health Organisation – in conjunction with British Fluoridation Society and School of Public Health  and School of Clinical Dentistry

http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862005000900012&script=sci_arttext

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALLEGED CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

Australian Government   

Australian Institute of Health & Welfare

Australia’s dental  generations  

The National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004–06
Funding sources for the 2004–06 National Survey of Adult Oral Health

Funding sourced from heavy silicofluoride promoters - I would think

this is similar to the fox left to guard the chickens!!!   This is a blatant

conflict of interests allegedly!!

National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant #299060
National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant #349514
National Health and Medical Research Council, Capacity Building Grant #349537
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Population Health
Division
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Colgate Oral Care
Australian Dental Association
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Research Participation Program

http://www.arcpoh.adelaide.edu.au/project/distribution/nsaoh_pdf%20files/nsaoh_report.pdf

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.thenhf.com/fluoridation/fluoridation_157/fluoridation_157.htm

Joining the Dots on Australian Fluoridation Fraud

By Paul Connett
www.FluorideActon.net
November 10, 2008

 I would like to draw your attention to four events in Australia which I believe demonstrate the corruption of science needed to propagate the discredited practice of water fluoridation in that country. Just join the dots.

Here are the four events:

  • A letter from Pieta-Ray Laut, Executive Director, Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) to Professor Warwick Anderson, Chief Executive Officer, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), dated 20 February 2007. Note the NHMRC is an agency of the Australian government. See letter at end.

  • The publication of the NHMRC report in November 2007: A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Fluoridation.

  • An article attacking opponents of fluoridation by Jason Armfield in the online journal Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, December, 2007, titled: When public action undermines public health: a critical examination of antifluoridationist literature - and my response to it at this same site.

  • The forcing through of mandatory water fluoridation on Queensland in February 2008 by Premier Anna Bligh. This of course, can be coupled with other ongoing efforts to force fluoridation on communities in NSW and Victoria, without giving them a chance to vote on the matter.

Elsewhere I have commented at some length on the "Easleyan" hatchet job on people opposed to fluoridation by Jason Armfield, and readers know well of our fruitless efforts to try to inform Premier Bligh on the dangers and ineffectiveness of fluoridation before she forced the practice on Queensland. Here I will focus on the NHMRC (2007) review an the PHAA letter.

The NHMRC (2007) report.

This report is being cited around the fluoridating world as the final word on the "safety and effectiveness" of water fluoridation. However, as far as addressing health concerns, a careful reading of this report indicates that at best, it is a work of professional incompetence or, at worst, an example of scientific fraud, in which scientific information is manipulated to support a preordained conclusion. There are six fundamental problems with this report.

1. The NHMRC's failure to make it clear that very little original work has been done investigating the health of fluoridated communities in Australia.

I think the average reader of a governmental report on fluoridation in a country which has been fluoridating its water for over 50 years would expect to read studies performed in their own country. However, virtually no health studies have been done in Australia on any organ or tissue other than the teeth. This is a particularly egregious omission because a previous review form this same agency over 17 years ago (NHMRC 1991) actually recommended that some health studies be done. This included recommending that fluoride bone levels be measured so that there would be a better handle on epidemiological studies on the bone. Not only were these bone levels not obtained, but no epidemiological studies on the bone were done either. The NHMRC (1991) also recommended that the many anecdotal reports that some citizens are particularly sensitive to fluoride be investigated scientifically. This also has not been done. The guiding principle in Australia - as well as other fluoridating countries - seems to be "if you don't look, you don't find." Which also means that when you apply systematic reviews to the literature - no matter how sophisticated the analyses might be - it is highly likely that there will be no damage to report.

2. The dominant interest in the report is on one organ: the teeth.

Of the 183 pages in the report, only a few pages in the text are devoted to health concerns.
26 pages to dental caries
23 pages to dental fluorosis
6 pages to bone fractures
7 pages to cancer
6 pages to other possible health effects

In other words more pages were devoted to both dental caries and dental fluorosis than all the other health issues combined. Once again we are reminded that the whole issue of water fluoridation, especially the money spent on research, has been captured and controlled by the dental lobby.

3. The NHMRC's cavalier dismissal of the relevance of the NRC (2006) report.

Even though citizens in Australia had requested that the NHMRC panel pay special attention to the NRC (2006) report, the authors dismissed this landmark 507-page report by the National Research Council: Fluoride In Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards, (NRC 2006, referred to as "NAS, 2006 below") in just two sentences:

"The reader is also referred to recent comprehensive reports regarding water fluoridation published by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2006) and the National Research Council of the National Academies (NAS, 2006). The NAS report refers to adverse health effects from fluoride at 2 - 4 mg/L, the reader is alerted to the fact that fluoridation of Australia's drinking water occurs in the range of 0.6 to 1.1 mg/L."

Such a dismissal of this important review - which took the panel 3.5 years to write - is unbelievable. The reason they give betrays a very poor understanding of toxicology.

First, for most toxic substances regulatory bodies are forced to use high dose animal experiments to extrapolate to concerns about low doses for humans. In the case of fluoride we have the luxury of being able to use dozens of relatively low dose human studies from India and China to inform our judgments.

Second, unless the study involves a very large number of subjects, when extrapolating to a "safe" level for a whole population, it is necessary to apply a safety factor (a margin of safety) to take into account the very large range of sensitivity to any toxic substance we can expect in a human population (intra-species variation). The factor usually chosen for this purpose is 10. Thus to dismiss findings of health effects reported in studies involving a small number of subjects consuming water between 2 and 4 ppm as irrelevant to a whole population consuming water at 1 ppm, is ridiculous.

Third, some of the studies reviewed in the NRC (2006) found or estimated effects at lower than 2 ppm (for example, Lin, 1991; Xiang, 2003).

Fourth, the NRC panel did an extensive exposure analysis (chapter 2) and concluded that some subsets of the population are already exceeding so called "safe" doses in drinking water fluoridated at 1 ppm. These include bottle-fed infants; above average water consumers like athletes, outdoor workers in hot climates, military personnel and people with diabetes; people with impaired kidney function and people who are borderline iodine deficient, which is a common problem in Australia.

4. The NHMRC's over-reliance on the York Review.

Instead of using the NRC (2006) review as their starting point the NHMRC panel went back to the York Review (McDonagh et al., 2000). However, they did this without acknowledging the caveats issued by those associated with this report. In particular, see the letter from professor Trevor Sheldon to the House of Lords. In fact, much of the NHMRC review is simply duplicating large parts of the analysis in the York Review! Like the York Review they spent much of their time on teeth, bones and cancer and bundled all the other health issues into one section. This section consisted of less than 6 pages, much of it being material reproduced from the York Review. They virtually ignore the issue of a possible relationship between fluoride exposure and the lowering of IQ in children (see point 6 below) as well as fluoride's impact on the thyroid and other parts of the endocrine system. These issues were extensively covered in the NRC (2006) report which they chose to ignore.

5. The NHMRC's questionable downplaying of the Bassin osteosarcoma study.

The NHMRC downplayed the important finding by Dr. Elise Bassin that young boys exposed to fluoridated water between their 6th and 8th years had a 5 to 7-fold increased risk of succumbing to osteosarcoma by the age of 20 using a "letter." So here we have a panel being extremely particular about what papers qualify for their analyses, but are willing to downplay a well conducted case-control study using a yet to be published study promised in a letter! Moreover, just in case people don't read the full text of the NHMRC review, the authors use exactly the same device and verbage in their Executive Summary.

Worse, the letter they use comes from none other than Professor Chester Douglass whose position on this whole matter is highly suspect. First, he is a co-author of a previous report which expressed concerns that a positive finding on osteosarcoma could threaten the fluoridation program (JADA 122:39-45, April 1991); second he has received government funding of over $1 million for his research on osteosarcoma and yet has published virtually nothing on the subject for over 18 years; third he is a consultant for Colgate, a manufacturer of fluoridated dental products and fourth he concealed Bassin's work from his peers, the public, the NRC panel and his funders for the three years between the successful defense of her thesis and its discovery in the rare books section of a Harvard library. Moreover, the Douglass study which is supposed to rebut Bassin's work - promised for the Summer of 2006 - has yet to appear in print. More significantly, the methodology Douglass has used is unlikely to challenge her finding since he is comparing osteosarcoma rates with bone levels of fluoride. As these levels are taken after the cases have been identified they give only a cumulative measure of fluoride exposure: i.e. these bone concentrations give no information on what levels of exposure the victims had to fluoride between the critical 6th to 8th years.

6. The NHMRC's failure to adequately cover the most recent literature indicating health problems, especially the studies relating fluoride exposure to the lowering of IQ in children.

In the small section in the NHMRC report which reviews other harms from fluoridation (pp 105-110), one of the York Review tables identified two IQ studies (Lin et al., 1991 and Zhao et al., 1996). However, the NHMRC search appears to have found no more. This is strange since had they actually read the NRC (2006) review, rather than dismissing its relevance, they would have found a whole chapter devoted to the brain, and in this they would have found three more IQ studies: Li et al., 1995; Lu et al., 2000; Xiang et al., 2003.

To make matters even worse, the NHMRC panel handled one of the two studies they do cite in a critically misleading fashion. They state:

"Lin (1991) found a significant association of combined low iodine and high fluoride with goiter and mental retardation." (my emphasis).

However, the level of fluoride in this study was not high at all, it was 0.88 ppm - i.e. less than 1 ppm! So not only did the NHMRC authors not take advantage of the research in the NRC (2006) review, which revealed the three extra IQ studies, but they haven't even read (or poorly read) one of the two IQ studies they actually do cite!

It should also be pointed out that the single sentence I have quoted above is the only reference they make to the fact that fluoride might damage the brain!

They state in their methodology that they only reviewed the literature in English published between 1996 and December 2006 so that gives them a possible excuse for ignoring the following studies: Seraj et al, 2006 (only the abstract was in English, the rest was in Persian); Trivedi, 2007; and Wang, et al., 2007. Even if they missed the chapter on the brain in the NRC (2006) report they should have been tipped off that this was an issue by the study by Zhao et al, 1996 (cited by the York Review) and listed in a table they reproduce. This study was published in the journal Fluoride. Serious researchers would have searched the archives of this journal - which are readily available on the internet - to see if this journal had published any more IQ studies since 1996 - and they have. They could also have found references to many of these studies had they bothered to visit our website. Under Health Studies, FAN has a whole section on fluoride and the brain - and it has been there for several years.

To have missed so much in the literature - and all the clues that it was there - would have been bad if we were talking about a term paper written by an undergraduate, but for a body on which a whole country is relying for health advice this is extremely shoddy research. But the more serious question is whether the handling of this issue by the NHMRC was a product of academic incompetence or a deliberate attempt to mislead the public. Which is easier to believe?

However, whatever excuses people care to make to explain the NHMRC panel on this matter, this ignorance should go no further. Those who glibly cite this NHMRC review as an authority on fluoridation's safety should be warned that there are now TWENTY THREE published studies which indicate that fluoride lowers IQ in children and these have been subjected to two systematic reviews, Connett and Limeback (2008) and Tang et al. (2008).

Nor does the matter end there. There are other Chinese studies which show that fluoride damages the fetal brain, as well as altering behavior of neonates and workers in the aluminum industry. Moreover, 12 Chinese studies on the brain (11 newly translated) have been reproduced in the journal FLUORIDE, so there is no excuse for government fluoridation promoters to continue to ignore this large body of Chinese work. In a future bulletin we will give a full citation list for all these studies on the brain, along with links where the full papers can be accessed.

Meanwhile, this NHMRC (2007) review is still being cited by fluoridation promoters in Canada (Dr. Peter Cooney, Chief Dental Officer), the UK (Dr. Barry Cockcroft, Chief Dental Officer) and the US (Dr. William Bailey at the CDC' Oral Health Division) as evidence that fluoridation is "safe." They will doubtless continue to do so, despite what I have written above, because, sadly like health authorities in Australia their agenda is to promote water fluoridation whatever the cost to public health.

The PHAA letter to the NHMRC.
Professor Warwick Anderson,
Chief Executive Officer,
National Health and medical Research Council,
GPO 1421,
CANBERRA, ACT 2601    20 February 2007

Dear Professor Anderson    Fluoridation Standards

The Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) is a forum for the promotion of the health of the public as well as being a professional resource for public health personnel. The PHAA has a strong interest in Oral Health.

The PHAA notes that while State and Territorial governments have made significant commitments recently to progress water fluoridation in Australia, the lack of a current statement of support for water fluoridation by NHMRC is a substantial threat to this work.

Groups opposed to water fluoridation currently refer to the NHMRC response:

"The NHMRC does not have a separate formal statement about fluoridation of the water supplies" (1) as evidence of a lack of support for water fluoridation.

At the 162 session of the NHMRC in September 2006, members supported the publication of the NHMRC's support of water fluoridation. PHAA acknowledges that recent NHMRC selective tender for the conduct of a systematic review of fluorides and health in Australia will be the first step in addressing this responsibility for raising the standard of individual and public health.

The Public Health Association of Australia is keen to see this work expedited and would be happy to contribute towards the development of a statement supporting water fluoridation in order to help reduce the confusion around this issue. Equally we would be happy to participate in a public workshop around this issue, as discussed in the 162 session.

We would be happy to talk this issue over with you or your staff should you think that would be helpful. I can be contacted on (02) 62852373 or at plaut@phaa.net.au

Yours sincerely,     Pieta-Ray Laut,   Executive Director
20 February 2007

For reference 1 see footnote on the original letter. ARTICLE ENDING

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 http://www.fluoridedebate.com/Download/fluoridedebate.pdf  

The Fluoride Debate

A Response to the American Dental

Association’s Booklet

Fluoridation Facts         From the Year 2000
CONCLUSION:
Seldom has an issue come before the public that affects our personal health (and our personal freedom) as much as does this one.  When the "smoke and mirrors" of the proponents of fluoridation
are cleared away by scientific evidence, it is plain that there is no justification for putting this toxic substance in our water supply.
"Esteemed Voices have, for 50 years, warned the American public that water fluoridation has dangerous long-term consequences to health." (See 43-3: List of 128 leading authorities who are opposed to fluoridation, Maureen Jones, San Jose Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, Telephone (408) 297-8487).     Following are some of their quotes:

"I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs. Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious effect on a long-range basis. Any attempt to use the water this way is
deplorable." Charles Gordon Heyd, M.D., Past President, American Medical Association.

On Nov. 24, 1992, Robert Carton, Ph.D., a former EPA scientist made this statement: "FLUORIDATION
IS THE GREATEST CASE OF SCIENTIFIC FRAUD OF THIS CENTURY, IF NOT OF ALL TIME."

Professor Albert Schatz, Ph.D., Microbiology, discoverer of the antibiotic streptomycin, was of the same opinion. His statement was: "fluoridation ... it is the greatest fraud that has ever been
perpetrated and it has been perpetrated on more people than any other fraud has."  

David R. Hill, P.Eng., Professor Emeritus, The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, in Aug. 1997, stated: "My own conclusion is that there are, at best, real unresolved and serious questions about the
safety and benefits of water fluoridation and related uses of fluoride.

The most recent evidence suggests it is not particularly beneficial, and certainly not safe. The most charitable interpretation that
one can put on the situation is that old habits die hard, and the medical/dental establishment is slow  to adapt to the realities of modern research, and is fearful of losing both face and law suits if they admit they made a mistake."

For too many decades we heard from scientists who worked for the cigarette companies that  cigarettes were not addictive, even in the face of mounting evidence of harm. No one died from smoking one cigarette, one pack, or one carton. But after twenty years, cancers started to "mysteriously" appear. We were told these deaths were unrelated to smoking.

Now, the American Cancer Society states that, "During 1995, approximately 2.1 million people in developed countries died as a result of smoking." Tobacco use is responsible for nearly one in five
deaths in the U.S. Scientists were wrong about tobacco; tobacco was not safe and neither is fluoride.

The powerful financial interests behind fluoridation have managed to keep the public from knowing the truth by controlling the media. Here is the opportunity for those who have the courage to speak out
and let the truth be known to do a real service for the public, who in the majority of cases have not even been given a choice in the matter.

Those opposed to fluoridation have but one thing to gain — water that is free of medication, a medication that has been proven time and again not to work for the purpose intended, and is harmful
to many.

It is time to bring the evidence out in a free and open discussion, where reason and facts are the guidelines, rather than emotion and politics. To ignore the issue is to let others make the decision for
us. It has been said that: "All bad men need is for good men to do nothing." Please help spread the true facts on this issue.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK AT THE TOP HEREOF AND DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE FLUORIDE DEBATE. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOME MORE TRUTH ON ROTTEN TEETH AND KIDNEY DISEASE COURTESY OF SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONED WATER - AN EXTRACT OF COLLECTED DATA

MORE INFORMATION ADDED AND SENT WITH MY EMAIL TO BLIGH QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT  TODAY 14.1.2009    Dear Bligh Government,        I refer to my innumerable emails to you regarding the continued poisoning of our water supplies with S6 silicofluoride  toxic poison waste from industry sources (under the guise of "water fluoridation" and your "so-called" public health measure and to my innumerable requests and demands (and also of my colleagues and many others & the evidence of experts around the world)  that you cease and desist from the continued poisoning of our water supplies due to such extensive and staggering evidence of harm and suppression of such evidence of  extreme harm from such "water fluoridation schemes".

I have attached some further data on kidney disease and it is essential that you enforce an immediate, permanent and irrevocable ban on yourself  and your accomplices and any and all other persons,  prohibiting the addition of such  toxic waste silicofluoride S6 poisons to the water supplies of We The People  once and for all, permanently and irrevocably.

Yours faithfully,  Diana Buckland,  4 Mia St. Kallangur,  4503   3285 3573    dbucklan@bigpond.net.au

Remember to check the websites hereunder for the true facts of silicofluoride S6 poisons you placed in our water supplies; this is where you will get the true facts not on the Government sites or the ADA.

Note: I will send to Moreton Bay Regional Councillors under separate cover as message recipients been reduced and unable to send message without reducing recipients.

RALLY AGAINST CHEMICAL WATER FLUORIDATION OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT HOUSE BRISBANE 9 AM - 11 AM 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009


Calling a Global Revolution against S6 poisons silicofluorides in our water supplies as "water fluoridation schemes".  These are dangerous poisons and the Evidence of Extreme Harm has been suppressed   http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/33574

 
POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES   http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html
Say No to water fluoridation S6 poisons globally.
 
Paul Connett's  FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK        www.fluoridealert.org/  
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER                   www.qawf.org
PEOPLE'S CLASS ACTION TRUST                    www.peoplesclassaction.org 
*FLUORIDE *INFORMATION* AUSTRALIA*             www.dianabuckland.webs.com
QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER GOLD COAST        www.thehealthvine.net
Say No to Recycled Sewerage & fluoride         www.goldcoastwaterwatch.webs.com
 
Diana Buckland
MCS-GLOBAL WEBSITE:  www.mcs-global.org

Dear Friends, I'm so deeply concerned for us and all our fellow Queenslanders and Australians, I am back on the kidney disease yet again; I think there is too much evidence to keep ignoring, and something has to be done. 

 

The Kidney Health Australia people have said that the community needs to make noise about "The Silent Killer" well, here we are SCREAMING LOUD AND CLEAR - STOP SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONS being placed in Australia's water supplies under the guise of "water fluoridation schemes" - the evidence of harm from around the world is simply staggering and frightening. None of you can continue to ignore it - one dot joins another dot and another dot and so on - you cannot gamble with the people's health, that's been done for too long already; and as I said, the evidence of harm, the evidence of bullying, fraud, collusion, corruption, intimidation, conflicts of interests and subsequent loss of integrity in science is overwhelming and encompasses the "water fluoridation fraud". That's not me just saying it, there’s enough extensive highly credible evidence from around the world to re-sink The Titanic. I believe that it is absolutely negligent and criminal to ignore such staggering evidence of harm. Now I know that myself and most other people could not just lay back and know that innumerable people are being harmed and suffering kidney disease, KHA don't quote numbers of people but they do say The cost of treating kidney disease in Australia is rising by $50 million a year and will jump from $700 million in 2006 to $900 million in 2010 - ok ALARM BELLS - stop immediately the poisoning of our water supplies. The evidence of harm is staggering and strong and indisputable from experts from around the world with credentials as long as your arm.

 

http://www.kidney.org.au/Whatwedo/Detection/tabid/602/Default.aspx

 North Ward Health Campus WHICH IS TOWNSVILLE

 

http://www.kidney.org.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lEFq1RpAfEs%3D&tabid=652&mid=1593

 

Townsville has taken its place in history as the first location in Australia to undertake a screening program for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).

Dr Tim Mathew Medical Director of Kidney Health Australia who visited Townsville for the program said, "A KEY program is vital in Australia to reduce the burden of kidney disease and kidney failure and the Townsville program could be the start of one of the most important and effective primary care programs to manage CKD in Australia."

----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.kidney.org.au/NewsEvents/MediaReleases/tabid/650/Default.aspx

The Community Needs to Make Noise About 'The Silent Killer' Kidney Health Australia said over two million Australians affected by Kidney Disease needed to make a noise about the chronic illness which is set to grow in epidemic proportions with an ageing population and trigger diseases such as diabetes and obesity. Read more>

 

 (Di's comment - you bet we are making a Noise about it - because we have got the evidence against silicofluoride S6 poisoned water and the damage to kidneys other organs and extensive evidence of harm, etc. etc..

 

Our Government is heavily advertising for organ transplant donors, well you already have many people with perhaps what I could term probable "fluoride" -induced kidney disease, there are going to be a lot more "damaged kidneys" - don't you think you had better act and apply The Precautionary Principle very quickly to stop "fluoridation schemes" when this evidence is there and the "lab rats" of Australia have done their job as S6 toxic waste disposal units?

 

I personally don't use the word "fluoride" much because the "fluoride pushers" have made it out to be an innocent necessary and wonderful thing; not the silicofluoride S6 poison toxic chemical waste from industry sources that it in fact is; and they just keep with such breathtaking arrogance ignoring the extensive credible evidence and continue on their way of poisoning the people; well it has to stop now.

 

 Sir Jack and Lady Margaret Brabham will become patrons of Kidney Health Australia to help raise awareness about Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia which affects over two million Australians and

is growing at 6% a year.

Read more> Kidney Health Australia has urged all State Governments to follow Victoria's preventative health strategy and screen workers for chronic disease. The cost of treating kidney disease in Australia is rising by $50 million a year and will jump from $700 million in 2006 to $900 million in 2010

 

The Economic Impact of Kidney Disease in Australia, report was undertaken by the George Institute of International Health eighteen months ago. Australia's health system needs to provide a framework of investigation for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in the high risk category of patients to stem the rapid growth of Chronic Kidney Disease patients being placed on dialysis.

 

One of the world's leading authorities on Chronic Kidney Disease and economic outcomes Professor Allan Collins today said "Chronic, non-communicable diseases (particularly cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease) have now replaced the communicable diseases as the leading threat to public health and health budgets worldwide according to the World Health Authority."

 

 Read more> Kidney Health Australia today said to satisfy thirst, water is the recommended fluid and nature's choice. See Drink water instead! our site. Water has no calories, is inexpensive and readily available. Though no single formula fits everyone, the amount of fluid you need to drink each day depends on your size, activity level and the weather. Read more>

(Di's comment: YES WE KNOW WE NEED TO DRINK LOTS OF WATER but not "fluoridated water" which we know causes/contributes to kidney disease.) (REFER PREVIOUS DATA I HAVE SUPPLIED ON 'WATER FLUORIDATION' i.e. silicofluoride S6 poison toxic waste AND KIDNEY DISEASE)

 

Every day our Federal Parliament sits our elected representatives process 45,200 litres of blood. Kidney Health Australia said that 1 in 3 members of every political party is at increased risk of developing CKD and 1 in 7 members has at least one clinical sign of existing CKD. Read more>

 

(Di's comment AND WITH THE SILICOFLUORIDE POISONS 'WATER FLUORIDATION' you will be guaranteed this.)

 

 http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/24/2145665.htm?site=northqld  

Jan. 2008

There has been an overwhelming response to what is said to be an Australian first kidney screening program to be held in Townsville, in north Queensland, next month. The Chronic Kidney Disease Program has already been booked out, with 160 bookings coming in just two days.

 

Anne Wilson, from Kidney Health Australia, says she has been pleased with the number of people who have requested the free service, which will be rolled out to other parts of the country later in the year. "It's going to be pretty brief. It's not really complex, it's actually a very simple point of care testing, and they will get their results there and then and those results, with the permission of participants, will be sent through to their GPs," she said.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

previous file on kidney disease joining the dots with silicofluoride S6 poisoning of our water supplies under the guise of "water fluoridation"

 

Diana Buckland: 4 Mia St. Kallangur, 4503 3285 3573 dbucklan@bigpond.net.au

I want to really focus on silicofluoride S6 poisons in the water supplies and kidney disease and teeth problems et al if I may.

 

I know in other areas I have some of this information already but I would like to focus on it here because when we put a lot of facts together the whole ghastly picture becomes much clearer and the dots begin to join up; I don’t want myself, my family or any other Queenslander and Australian and other citizens of the world to suffer illnesses and diseases from silicofluoride S6 poisoned water, there is already horrendous problems from global chemical pollution and the idiots continue to S6 poisons the water supplies, they are either idiots or have a really evil agenda, there can be no other answer for such criminal actions.

 

You will remember The Sydney Daily Mirror article, 9th October, 1989, “Hundreds of under 10’s in Sydney’s West have teeth beyond repair. Also The A.D.A. President is quoted in the Tasmanian Advocate, 4th May, 2001, as follows: “Tasmania is on the brink of a dental crisis.” That statement of a dental crisis after almost 50 years of compulsory fluoridation.

 

This kind of dental data is repeated in the Sydney Morning Herald, February, 2005. A MATTER OF NEARLY 20 YEARS LATER, after 37 years of compulsory fluoridation in Sydney. Please read the entire document here http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2006%20Final%20Website%20Files/a_study_of_fluoridation_confusion.htm  

CHEMICAL WATER FLUORIDATION > Kidney disease……….. No room at the inn: The New South Wales Opposition says it is concerned renal dialysis services are operating at full capacity across western Sydney, potentially compromising patient care.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/09/2441048.htm  

 

ALARM BELLS SHOULD BE RINGING REALLY LOUDLY PEOPLE OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA & THE WORLD! Tasmania has the worst dental health in the nation after 50+ years of chemical water fluoridation (ie silicofluoride S6 poisoning of their water ways); see note further below also regarding Tasmanian Parliament Kidney Week and Kidney disease in Tasmania for 2005/2006.

 

Note the number of chemical silicofluoride “industrial plants” in Tasmania!!

http://eldib.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/studies-suggest-that-over-consumption-of-fluoride-can-raise-the-risks-of-disorders-affecting-teeth-bones-the-brain-and-the-thyroid-gland/#comments  .............................................................................................................................................

 

FLUORIDE CAUSES KIDNEY DISEASE: http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/gfm663v1  

FLUORIDATION OF COMMUNITY WATER ACTUALLY CAUSES KIDNEY DISEASE.

CONFIRMED: YOUR ALARM BELLS CONTINUING TO GO OFF MY FRIENDS.

 .............................................................................................................................................American Dentists Association Admits: Fluoride of Concern to Kidney Patients At least three NRC panel members conclude that water fluoride levels should be close to zero, not only to protect kidney patients, but also thyroid patients, infants and high water drinkers. This would effectively shut down fluoridation in the U.S. But organized dentistry isn’t going to let go of its pet project and diminish its political viability by admitting fluoridation is a failed experiment.

http://onenationwa.asn.au/Media/Letters%20of%20Interest/American%20Dentists%20Association%20Admits.pdf

 

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFULLY HORRENDOUSLY CRIMINAL TO HAVE ALL THIS STAGGERING EVIDENCE OF HARM AND ALLOW SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONING OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES TO CONTINUE - THEY’RE CRIMINALS TO DO THIS!

..........................................................................................

KIDNEY DISEASE 2005-2006 figures. Chronic Kidney Disease is responsible for the highest number of hospital visits to public hospitals in Australia. In 2005 / 2006 one third of all admissions to public hospitals were due to dialysis, 2000 each day of the year.

 

In 2005 / 2006 a total of 731,000 visits out of a total of 2.215 million hospital admissions were related to kidney disease. In Tasmania in 2005 / 2006 a total of 12,400 hospital admissions were related to kidney disease.

 

(Remember Tasmania’s statistics, worst dental health in the Nation after 50+ years of chemical water fluoridation (silicofluoride S6 poisons) and problems with kidney disease -

hello! are you all insane to continue doing this Ms Bligh & other Premiers of Australia?? http://www.kidney.org.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rNY7BDu3sYU%3D&tabid=650&mid=455  ............................................................................................................................................

.

Call for action to combat surge in kidney disease (Do you hear that Ms Bligh? & Australia’s other Premiers?)

 

Call for action to combat surge in Kidney disease, yes Ms Bligh & Co., please get the silicofluoride S6 poisons out of Australia’s water supplies NOW before you harm anymore of the population with this S6 poison.

 

March 2, 2008 CHRONIC kidney disease sufferers will double in number over the next decade unless the Government starts national preventive screening of high-risk groups, according to one of the world’s experts on the rampant “silent killer”

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/call-for-action-to-combat-surge-in-kidney-disease/2008/03/01/1204227055259.html

 

Yes Ms Bligh & Co. & other Premiers of Australia - please get the silicofluoride S6 poisons out of Australia’s water supplies NOW before you harm anymore of the population with this S6 poison - you will see in the figures from kidney health .....................................................................................................................................

 

And here is some more figures:- Kidney Health Australia has urged all State Governments to follow Victoria's preventative health strategy and screen workers for chronic disease. The cost of treating kidney disease in Australia is rising by $50 million a year and will jump from $700 million in 2006 to $900 million in 2010 - The Economic Impact of Kidney Disease in Australia, report was undertaken by the George Institute of International Health eighteen months ago.

 

So  you had all better remove your silicofluoride s6 poisons from every state of australia or trust me, we the people will sue you all until your heads spin and roll - you will all be ruined - this disease alone, kidney disease, how dare you continue poisoning our countrymen with s6 toxic waste material - was this a laboratory test over 50+ years starting in tasmania to see how the human toxic waste disposal units coped - you are criminals to do such a thing – and mark my words, the people will revolt, because they continue to hear about it - we will not be silenced.

 

we care about our fellow countrymen and all people and life forms and we don't like corrupt filthy schemes like "water fluoridation schemes" harming our fellow australians, or anyone else in the world or our total environment. so each and every one of you premiers in australia, and you please mr. kevin dudd, please pull your fingers out, and get to and remove those silicofluoride s6 poisons from all of australia's water supplies immediately, permanently and irrevocably, or you will all live to regret not taking such preventative action.

you have been told all the evidence of harm that is staggering so you will all be held liable for criminal negligence if you continue'fluoridating' australia with known silicofluoride s6 poisons.

 

it's so outrageous that you have all allowed this to go on i'm absolutely aghast and i keep thinking of all those people who are suffering because of the silicofluoride s6 poisons in their water supplies, i'm simply horrified and immensely distressed that you could do this to we the people; you have not only failed us all, you have harmed us all. that is criminal!

 

POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES - http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html  

Silicofluorides S6 poisons Extract: Fluoridation, laundry sours, opalescent glass, metallurgy (aluminium and beryllium), vitreous enamel frits, insecticides and rodenticides, chemical intermediate, glue, leather and wood preservative, moth repellent, manufacture of pure silicon.

 

HELLO!! Toxic if swallowed! Severe exposure from ingestion may result in muscular weakness, tremors, convulsions, collapse, dyspnea, cardiac failure and death. May cause eye irritation. May cause destruction of eye tissue.

 

Toxic in contact with skin! Moisture and perspiration will accelerate tissue destruction. Prolonged skin contact may cause a severe effect, progressing to a delayed burn.

Toxic by inhalation! Breathing high concentrations of dust may lead to acute poisoning. Severe exposure may result in respiratory failure and death. ................................................................................................................................

 

And finally another reminder to put it altogether:-

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/14/1060588496893.html

 

SMH article from 2003 extract: In 2000, Australia recorded the second-worst levels of fillings, missing teeth and cavities among the OECD for 35- to 44-year-olds, while a recent survey found the rate of gum disease has almost doubled among the over-65 population during the past 14 years.

 

(Di comment: yes, much silicofluoride S6 poisoning of Australia’s water supplies already for many years - some places 40 and 50 years).

 

As at 2007, the hefty "fluoride pushers" at the NHMRC in their The Efficacy and Safety of Fluoridation 2007 which was nothing but a document of pure perjury in my opinion, stating the safety and denying any harm, criminal it is!    

 

At that time the silicofluoride S6 poison toxic waste contaminants deliberated placed into Australia's water supplies was:-

 

 WA 92% NT 70% SA 90% TAS 83% VIC 77% ACT 100% NSW 92%

Queensland was the Smart State for a while as @ 2007 report and up to Dec. 2008 when Bligh & Co. dropped the S6 poison in our water supplies also; before that we had 5% & Townsville silicofluoride S6 poisoned water for 40 years.

 

Researchers from Westmead Hospital’s Institute of Dental Research also released results of new research last month that showed they had discovered more than 20 new species of the Prevotella bacteria, which reside within decaying human teeth.

 

The institute’s director, Professor Neil Hunter, says the bacteria, which have the potential to cause a wide range of infections such as sinusitis, pneumonia, meningitis and wound infections, are becoming more prevalent due to public health measures, including water fluoridation.

 

HELLO!     Fluoridated teeth have hard shells but they decay and they hollow,” he says. “Fluoride makes the outside of the tooth very hard but they are like a tree - the bark on the outside can appear very hard but the inside can be rotten and you won’t discover this until the tree falls over.

 

 (Di comment: yes, this is certainly an admission that “fluoride” is totally ineffective; and we know it’s incredibly dangerous….. ineffective + dangerous.. what we’ve all said all along).

YES AND THE Professor told the truth, they'll probably draw and quarter him for that!!

 

(Di’s further comment: What ALL Australians need is access to affordable dentistry + oral hygiene guidance AND GET THE SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONS WHICH YOU REFER TO AS “WATER FLUORIDATION” OUT OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES IMMEDIATELY, PERMANENTLY AND IRREVOCABLY AND WE DEMAND THAT THIS BE DONE AUSTRALIA WIDE TO STOP THE HORRENDOUS ENDANGERMENT TO HEALTH OF THE ENTIRE POPULATION.)

 

Professor Neil Hunter continues, “These bacteria invade a tooth when there is a small defect and once they get within the hard surface, there really is not that much stopping them.”      end extract  

 

Di’s further comment, in 2000 reports emerged about Cavistat a new fluoride-free bacteria fighting calcium compound which the Dental Journals.

. ……………………………………………………………

Fluoride - Damning new evidence Researcher Doris Jones has unearthed startling new evidence demonstrating that fluoride interferes with enzyme systems, damaging many organ systems of the body.

http://www.wddty.com/03363800373095226754/fluoride-damning-new-evidence.html

 

…………………………………………………………

2003 “FLUORIDE” article by Mary Sparrowdancer    

 

A lot of information in this one article; very worrying indeed.

 

Study the information herein carefully please, note the refs. to gum and throat diseases, silent epidemic of gum diseases, orthopaedic diseases et al etc. etc. extensive information.

 

Extract: In Colorado, the rate of suicide among teenagers, children and young adults has been consistently above the national average since 1980.   Suicide is, sadly, the second-leading cause of death in children between the ages of 10 through 19 in Colorado.

 

 In Kentucky, suicide is also the second leading cause of death in children, teens and young adults. In Mississippi, the number of teen and young-adult suicides has increased 126% since 1969, with more than 90% of the victims being males.

In Alaska, the suicide rate among teenagers is nearly twice that of the national average - twice. (21, 22, 23, 24)

Other strange surges in human suffering have been noted, as well. In Colorado, from 1990 through 1999, the percentage of children with orthopedic impairments rose 484%. In Alaska, during 1990-98, the incidence of diabetes increased by 152%, (much greater than the national rate), and now Alaska is among the top three states with the highest incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. (25, 26)

 

In the midst of all this growing and tragic suffering, in the year 2000 the Surgeon General issued a “first ever” call to action in response to what was noted as a “silent epidemic” of dental problems in the United States. Something strange is happening in the mouths of Americans. (27)

 

According to the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, an estimated 80% of American adults currently have some form of periodontal (gum) disease. In parts of Kentucky, nearly half of the toddlers have cavities in their teeth, which is approximately twice the national average. In addition to Kentucky, the top five states cited in a 1997 table used in the Surgeon General’s report on toothlessness included West Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas and Maine. (28, 29, 30) Perhaps it is at this point that one might begin to reasonably suspect that whatever lies at the cause of this epidemic of epidemics - whatever is disabling Americans in body, mind and spirit - just might be something we are putting into our mouths or otherwise absorbing into our bodies. This is not an unreasonable suspicion.

 http://www.hemuz.org/Health/Fluoride-The-Battle-of-Darkness-Light

 ..................................................................................................................

 

I’m just an ordinary woman doing my utmost to protect myself, my family and my fellow Aussies & world citizens; we deserve much better than we are getting, our leaders should be protecting us all; not endangering the entire population.

 

 I am honoured to be fighting this fight with the best people in the world and there are lots of us and we wont stop until you stop poisoning our water and us all.   Regards, Di Buckland, Kallangur, Queensland, dbucklan@bigpond.net.au


Remember: Please study these websites for the true facts on silicofluoride S6 poisons known as "water fluoridation" not the "fairy stories" supplied by the Queensland and Australian Government.

 

These are dangerous poisons and the Evidence of Extreme Harm has been suppressed http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/33574

 

POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html

Paul Connett's FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK www.fluoridealert.org/

QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER www.qawf.org

PEOPLE'S CLASS ACTION TRUST www.peoplesclassaction.org

*FLUORIDE *INFORMATION* AUSTRALIA* www.dianabuckland.webs.com

QUEENSLANDERS FOR SAFE WATER GOLD COAST www.thehealthvine.net

Say No to Recycled Sewerage & fluoride www.goldcoastwaterwatch.webs.com

PLEASE VISIT MURRAY'S THOMPSON’S WEBSITE:

POISONED PEOPLE http://poisonedpeople.com/  

Original Information sent:   (much more since) 

Even though this information already is included in this website, I thought it would be easier for me to include some of it here;  this will show you that this is definitely extremely serious and dangerous indeed; kidney disease is hugely on the rise,  demand these S6 poisons be removed from our water supplies and stop endangering and damaging the health of our State and our Nation.     Let your voices be heard that you will not allow this appalling practice to continue under the guise of dental health - join the global revolution  against this - tell our Governments in no uncertain way, that you will not allow this poisoning of our water supplies to continue -  let the Government  also provide AFFORDABLE DENTISTRY for all Queenslanders and all Australians.

I want to really focus on silicofluoride S6 poisons in the water supplies and kidney disease and teeth problems et al if I may. I know in other areas I have some of this information already but I would like to focus on it here because when we put a lot of facts together the whole ghastly/culpable picture becomes much clearer and the dots begin to join up; I don’t want myself, my family or any other Queenslander and Australian and other citizens of the world to suffer illnesses and diseases from silicofluoride S6 poisoned water, there is already horrendous problems from global chemical pollution and the idiots continue to S6 poisons the water supplies, they are either idiots or have a really evil and sinister  agenda, there can be no other answer for such criminal actions.

You will remember The Sydney Daily Mirror article, 9th October, 1989, “Hundreds of under 10’s in Sydney’s West have teeth beyond repair. Also The A.D.A. President is quoted in the Tasmanian Advocate, 4th May, 2001, as follows: “Tasmania is on the brink of a dental crisis.” That statement of a dental crisis after almost 50 years of compulsory fluoridation. This kind of dental data is repeated in the Sydney Morning Herald, February, 2005. A MATTER OF NEARLY 20 YEARS LATER, after 37 years of compulsory fluoridation in Sydney.      

Please read the entire document here      http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride2006%20Final%20Website%20Files/a_study_of_fluoridation_confusion.htm    

CHEMICAL WATER FLUORIDATION =   Kidney disease……….. No room at the inn:      The New South Wales Opposition says it is concerned renal dialysis services are operating at full capacity across western Sydney, potentially compromising patient care. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/09/2441048.htm

ALARM BELLS SHOULD BE RINGING REALLY LOUDLY PEOPLE OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA & THE WORLD!

Tasmania has the worst dental health in the nation after 50+ years of chemical water fluoridation (ie silicofluoride S6 poisoning of their water ways); see note further below also regarding Tasmanian Parliament Kidney Week and Kidney disease in Tasmania for 2005/2006.

http://eldib.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/studies-suggest-that-over-consumption-of-fluoride-can-raise-the-risks-of-disorders-affecting-teeth-bones-the-brain-and-the-thyroid-gland/#comments  ......................................................................................................................................................

FLUORIDE CAUSES KIDNEY DISEASE:

http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/gfm663v1 

FLUORIDATION OF COMMUNITY WATER ACTUALLY CAUSES KIDNEY DISEASE.
CONFIRMED: YOUR ALARM BELLS CONTINUING TO GO OFF MY FRIENDS. ......................................................................................................................................................American Dentists Association Admits:

Fluoride of Concern to Kidney Patients At least three NRC panel members conclude that water fluoride levels should be close to zero, not only to protect kidney patients, but also thyroid patients, infants and high water drinkers. This would effectively shut down fluoridation in the U.S. But organized dentistry isn’t going to let go of its pet project and diminish its political viability by admitting fluoridation is a failed experiment.

http://onenationwa.asn.au/Media/Letters%20of%20Interest/American%20Dentists%20Association%20Admits.pdf

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGRACEFULLY HORRENDOUSLY CRIMINAL TO HAVE ALL THIS STAGGERING EVIDENCE OF HARM AND ALLOW SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONING OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES TO CONTINUE - THEY’RE CRIMINALS TO DO THIS TO WE THE PEOPLE ! .......................................................................................

KIDNEY DISEASE 2005-2006 figures. Chronic Kidney Disease is responsible for the highest number of hospital visits to public hospitals in Australia. In 2005 / 2006 one third of all admissions to public hospitals were due to dialysis, 2000 each day of the year.

In 2005 / 2006 a total of 731,000 visits out of a total of 2.215 million hospital admissions were related to kidney disease. In Tasmania in 2005 / 2006 a total of 12,400 hospital admissions were related to kidney disease.

(Remember Tasmania’s statistics, worst dental health in the Nation after 50+ years of chemical water fluoridation (silicofluoride S6 poisons) and problems with kidney disease -

hello! are you all insane to continue doing this Ms Bligh & other Premiers of Australia??

http://www.kidney.org.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=rNY7BDu3sYU%3D&tabid=650&mid=455  ......................................................................................................................................................

 Call for action to combat surge in kidney disease (Do you hear that Ms Bligh? & Australia’s other Premiers?) Call for action to combat surge in Kidney disease, yes Ms Bligh & Co., please get the silicofluoride S6 poisons out of Queensland and Australia’s water supplies NOW before you harm anymore of the population with this S6 poison.

March 2, 2008 CHRONIC kidney disease sufferers will double in number over the next decade unless the Government starts national preventive screening of high-risk groups, according to one of the world’s experts on the rampant “silent killer” http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/call-for-action-to-combat-surge-in-kidney-disease/2008/03/01/1204227055259.html    yes Ms Bligh & Co. & other Premiers of Australia - please get the silicofluoride S6 poisons out of Australia’s water supplies NOW before you harm anymore of the population with this S6 poison.
.........................................................................................................................................................

 POISON IN YOUR WATER SUPPLIES http://www.redox.com/msds/data/sosili.html  

Silicofluorides S6 poisons       Extract: Fluoridation, laundry sours, opalescent glass, metallurgy (aluminium and beryllium), vitreous enamel frits, insecticides and rodenticides, chemical intermediate, glue, leather and wood preservative, moth repellent, manufacture of pure silicon.

HELLO!! Toxic if swallowed! Severe exposure from ingestion may result in muscular weakness, tremors, convulsions, collapse, dyspnea, cardiac failure and death. May cause eye irritation.    May cause destruction of eye tissue.

Toxic in contact with skin! Moisture and perspiration will accelerate tissue destruction. Prolonged skin contact may cause a severe effect, progressing to a delayed burn.

Toxic by inhalation! Breathing high concentrations of dust may lead to acute poisoning. Severe exposure may result in respiratory failure and death.
..................................................................................................................................

And finally a reminder to put it altogether:- http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/14/1060588496893.html  SMH article from 2003

extract:
In 2000, Australia recorded the second-worst levels of fillings, missing teeth and cavities among the OECD for 35- to 44-year-olds, while a recent survey found the rate of gum disease has almost doubled among the over-65 population during the past 14 years. (Di comment: yes, much silicofluoride S6 poisoning of Australia’s water supplies already for many years).

Researchers from Westmead Hospital’s Institute of Dental Research also released results of new research last month that showed they had discovered more than 20 new species of the Prevotella bacteria, which reside within decaying human teeth.

The institute’s director, Professor Neil Hunter, says the bacteria, which have the potential to cause a wide range of infections such as sinusitis, pneumonia, meningitis and wound infections, are becoming more prevalent due to public health measures, including water fluoridation.

“Fluoridated teeth have hard shells but they decay and they hollow,” he says. “Fluoride makes the outside of the tooth very hard but they are like a tree - the bark on the outside can appear very hard but the inside can be rotten and you won’t discover this until the tree falls over. (Di comment: yes, this is certainly an admission that “fluoride” is totally ineffective; and we know it’s incredibly dangerous….. ineffective + dangerous.. what we’ve all said all along).

(Di’s further comment:    What ALL Australians need is access to affordable dentistry + oral hygiene guidance AND GET THE SILICOFLUORIDE S6 POISONS WHICH YOU REFER TO AS “WATER FLUORIDATION” OUT OF OUR WATER SUPPLIES IMMEDIATELY, PERMANENTLY AND IRREVOCABLY.    He continues  "These bacteria invade a tooth when there is a small defect and once they get within the hard surface, there really is not that much stopping them.” end extract. ……………………………………………………………

Fluoride - Damning new evidence Researcher Doris Jones has unearthed startling new evidence demonstrating that fluoride interferes with enzyme systems, damaging many organ systems of the body.
http://www.wddty.com/03363800373095226754/fluoride-damning-new-evidence.html
…………………………………………………………

2003 “FLUORIDE” article by Mary Sparrowdancer A lot of information in this one article; very worrying indeed. Study the information herein carefully please, note the refs. to gum and throat diseases, silent epidemic of gum diseases, orthopaedic diseases et al etc.etc.extensive information.

Extract: In Colorado, the rate of suicide among teenagers, children and young adults has been consistently above the national average since 1980.
Suicide is, sadly, the second-leading cause of death in children between the ages of 10 through 19 in Colorado. In Kentucky, suicide is also the second leading cause of death in children, teens and young adults. In Mississippi, the number of teen and young-adult suicides has increased 126% since 1969, with more than 90% of the victims being males. In Alaska, the suicide rate among teenagers is nearly twice that of the national average - twice. (21, 22, 23, 24)

Other strange surges in human suffering have been noted, as well. In Colorado, from 1990 through 1999, the percentage of children with orthopedic impairments rose 484%. In Alaska, during 1990-98, the incidence of diabetes increased by 152%, (much greater than the national rate), and now Alaska is among the top three states with the highest incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. (25, 26)

In the midst of all this growing and tragic suffering, in the year 2000 the Surgeon General issued a “first ever” call to action in response to what was noted as a “silent epidemic” of dental problems in the United States. Something strange is happening in the mouths of Americans. (27)

According to the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, an estimated 80% of American adults currently have some form of periodontal (gum) disease. In parts of Kentucky, nearly half of the toddlers have cavities in their teeth, which is approximately twice the national average. In addition to Kentucky, the top five states cited in a 1997 table used in the Surgeon General’s report on toothlessness included West Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas and Maine. (28, 29, 30) Perhaps it is at this point that one might begin to reasonably suspect that whatever lies at the cause of this epidemic of epidemics - whatever is disabling Americans in body, mind and spirit - just might be something we are putting into our mouths or otherwise absorbing into our bodies. This is not an unreasonable suspicion.

Full article here:  
http://www.hemuz.org/Health/Fluoride-The-Battle-of-Darkness-Light  ..................................................................................................................

I’m just an ordinary Aussie mum doing my utmost to protect myself, my family and my fellow Aussies & world citizens; we deserve much better than we are getting, our leaders should be protecting us all; not endangering the entire population by deliberately placing silicofluoride S6 poisons in our water supplies, not that's an act of insanity and criminality when all the staggering amount of evidence of harm is put together.   It is my contention that the world's population have been used as LAB RATS - they are the science and it's criminal.

Warmest regards, Di Buckland, Kallangur, Queensland, dbucklan@bigpond.net.au

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please visit Glen's site, it is a wealth of accurate and truthful  information from an amazing wonderful gentleman who has been fighting the scourge and fraud of "water fluoridation" here in Australia  for many years.    You will learn so much from Glen's site.  His fact and the Government and ADA & pals  fiction.

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/welcome.htm

Please ensure you read all Glen's Reports as per link above.  

Australian  Fluoridation   News

http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/about_glen_walker.htm

 

About G So who is responsible for the printed version of the AFN?


 

Glen Walker is the inspiration behind the AFN. What makes Glen such an incredible fellow is that he reached the age of 94 in 2008. How many other people of his age can claim to put in the work rate that Glen does?

Many accolades could be poured upon Glen, but I would like to quote from one of his books: Fluoridation, Poison on Tap.

About the Author

Glen S. R. Walker, F.I.M.F., E.M.E.C.S., M.A.E.S., is Chairman of the Freedom From Fluoridation Federation of Australia, and of the Anti-Fluoridation Association of Victoria.

His experience in technical and scientific organisations throughout the world has been extensive.

In 1968 he was the first Australian to be made a Fellow of the Institute of Metal Finishing, London, an international society entry into which is controlled by technical and scientific examination, and his Fellowship was awarded for his work in that field which has received international recognition.

He is also an Emeritus Member of the Electrochemical Society, U.S.A. having been a member for over forty years.

He has represented Australia many times at international scientific conferences. His business and scientific interests took him overseas almost every year, where he studied developments in several fields of industry.

During World War II, he acted as a consultant to the Australian Army, Navy and Air Force, the American Air Force, Government Ordinance Factories, and sub-contractors to the Ministry of Munitions.

He was a member of a Sub-Committee of the Wartime Ministry of Munitions which controlled the use and supply of strategic metals. He was also a partner in a chemical company that manufactured special chemicals war-time use.

He has written many papers for local and overseas journals.

After the war he was the proprietor of a chemical laboratory which held a highest qualification in Australia - registration by the N.A.T.A. (National Association of Testing Authorities).

The author and the staff of this laboratory pioneered the determination trace impurities in electrolytes, using the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer which was invented by the C.S.I.R.O. This is now universally used throughout the world.

Glen Walker also held a number of patents in the field of metal finishing.

The Author's experience with fluorides, cover over forty years from when the chemical was first used in electrochemical formulations, and remembers the hazards and dangers in using fluoride chemicals, and the extreme caution required in handling them.

Long before his active interest in fluoridation, he was "a voice in the wilderness" being an early advocate for the control of industrial pollution.

In 1969 he gave evidence before an Australian Government Senate Select Committee, and offered his services to establish a policy from which industry would not only be encouraged, but made aware of the necessity, availability and economy of proper effluent treatment plants. He studied proven processes in the U.S.A. and obtained manufacturing rights for Australia.

Further representation to the Federal and State Governments and its departments, resulted in complete indifference.

Is it any wonder he looked upon the Victorian Compulsory Fluoridation Act of 1973 with interest and great concern? Instead of industrial chemical waste disposal units, the Government now makes every person in Victoria a walking waste disposal unit for a trade waste."

 To learn more  from Glen Walker click here   http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/welcome.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2007%20Final%20Website%20Files/AFN%20May%20June%202007%20Edition.pdf

Extract:       In the same way, to prevent the public knowing the truth and to avoid the normal processes of law which uphold the will of the people, the Australian Government renamed fluoride toothpaste from a S5 poison to a cosmetic, to avoid showing the “POISONlabel on toothpaste tubes, and the American Government cleverly renamed the Guantanamo Bay inmates as “enemy combatants” as opposed to prisoners of war to avoid human rights conventions.

 

Fluoride Poisoning in Killen’s Home Town

It is ironic that a local family was almost killed by excessive fluoride added to the town water supply at Dalby, 12 years after Sir James Killen, who was born in Dalby, initiated one of the few defeats of the Menzies Government on the floor of the House. Almost 4 months after the poisoning, Dalby aldermen confessed the near tragedy had been deliberately covered up.

 

Former Alderman L.T. Sturgess revealed that the Council employee and members of his family had been almost killed when a massive fluoride overdose accidentally got into their water supply. They had been admitted to Dalby hospital with what was later diagnosed as fluoride poisoning. Mr Sturgess alleged that the town Health Committee withheld details from the public.

 

No record of fluoride poisoning could be located in Council’s business papers, although Council records showed radical variations in the quantity of sodium fluoride added to the water supply, as well as major variations in the average monthly fluoride concentration in the water as shown in the Table…………….

 

An angry public meeting in January 1977 demanded an end to fluoridation of the town’s water supply.

 

The Dalby disaster is an example of highly the toxic nature of the chemicals used in artificial fluoridation and that artificial fluoridation plants are not safe.

 

Another extract:     THE PARROT SCIENTIFIC DENTAL HYPERBOLE  By Glen S.R. Walker

 

What a remarkable collection of Professional and Political people we have and their day by day playing the same old scratched recording that repeats ad nauseum that all we really need to stop dental decay is the addition of fluoride chemicals in our drinking water supplies.

 

The ring of truth turns into a dull flat note of complete scientific, dental, medical state of flummoxed gobbledegook, even taught in Universities.   The cry of those groups from the Prime Minister down, through the general State Parliaments, and their “Health Experts”, all complaining of the huge dental problems throughout Australia, including their precious fluoridation installations areas serving over 80% of the population, that require more dentists to start any kind of reversal of the increasing dental decay and improving the 5 year waiting time for public dental service.

 

The cry for more dentists has informed the population of Australia that compulsory artificial fluoridation has failed, but that they, the people, must carry the burden of its failure because if the truth were properly exposed, there

would be a large exodus of its supporters scurrying away from identification.

 

Political fluoridation honesty (?) and history, officially documented in the Hansard of all Australian Governments, should again be brought before the people to illustrate the way Australians are “lead up the garden path” by the people you voted into Parliament to represent you in an Ethical Constitutional manner.

The Failure of Fluoridation and False Explanations There must be some handsome rewards available for those “thinking up” reasons for:

 

(1)   The absolute failure of fluoridation and

 

(2)  the 5 year waiting time in fluoridated areas for dental service, required to relieve the distress of so many Australians who were guaranteed by their arliaments, the ADA, AMA, NH&MRC etc, etc, that with the introduction of fluoridation, “there would be no more tooth decay”! Show some proof? A reasonable question.

Federal Parliament 3rd October, 1989 (Hansard p.

1210):

The Minister of Health, Dr. Blewett, stated:

 

“The dentists are speaking entirely without self - interest, because it can clearly be shown that they have lost a lot of customers and clients as a result of the effect of fluoridation of water. They are speaking from a public health point of view.”

 

Results since that announcement:-

• More new Dental Hospitals

• More dental decay

• More fluoridation plants

• More dentists since fluoridation

• Dentists in the highest income bracket

• More Government money - Federal Government to spend $500,000 to help 400,000 people waiting up to 5 years for dental service. (Election announcement 2005)

 

Without exception Capital City daily papers print articles on the unacceptable state of dental health all over Australia, but none seem courageous enough to print the true reasons for dental decay and those responsible for this health dilemma.

 

The regular contributions to the media by dental “experts” use some highly irregular and supercilious dental statements that are not allowed correction.   Example -

(1) “Fluoride is a nutrient”! Should read “Fluorides are poisons” but the public are misled with propaganda rather than FACT.

(2) One statement that is used extensively in

Government literature:

“There are 1000 studies in more than 20 countries which have shown that water fluoridation reduces tooth decay in both children and adults. Fluoride works directly on the surface of the teeth so it is beneficial to everyone throughout life.”

(Victorian Government Health Department book - “Fluoridation strengthens teeth throughout life - 2002”.)

Here is fluoridation at its peak of propaganda but without any proof of scientific fact. Indeed when challenged, it was withdrawn from further print!

(3) The Australian Dental Journal, 1986 heading “Mutagenicity”, the ADA Journal stated:

“The fluoride ion is an endogenous ion of the human organism . . .”

If this statement in the ADA Journal were factual, every normal human system would be naturally supplied with metabolically-balanced “endogenous” fluoride ions, and

fluoride use in drinking water could never be justified (Guthrie, Australian Dental Journal 1986).

 

The Victorian Government Committee of Inquiry into Fluoridation, 1980, was awash with mistakes of an unimaginable magnitude but was presented to the Parliament by Rupert Hamer, Premier of Victoria, as “being a scholarly and erudite overview on fluoridation.”

The Report stated, Chapter 6, p. 17, that:

“. . . even the most susceptible (plants) can tolerate up to 100 p.p.m. (parts per million) HF (Hydrogen Fluoride) from atmospheric sources”. Reference, Report on Fluorides by U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C. using the prefix, “VOSTAL

J.J. et.al.” (Dr. J. Vostal was Chairman of the Committee that wrote that Report).

 

Dr. Vostal was contacted by this author and rejected the Victorian Government Inquiry statement of 100 ppm HF as safe for “the most susceptible plants”.

The U.S. Report stated “the threshold for susceptible plants is about 0.58 parts per Billion”, which is 171,414 times less than that claimed by the Victorian Government

Report.    

An Australian study has shown that susceptible grape species are affected by even smaller amounts of HF at 0.22 parts per billion. (W.J. Greenhalgh et.al, Dept. of Agronomy and Horticultural Science, University of Sydney.)

 

There is no limit to wrong scientific data presented to the public as a commercial sales practice in their fluoridation propaganda, which frighteningly never seems to worry responsible authorities which exist to safeguard the people from such dangerous dodgy actions.

 FLUORIDATION, THE FARCICAL MEDICAL CONCEPT

Click on link for Glen walker’s AFN complete reports and more: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~fluoride/2007%20Final%20Website%20Files/AFN%20May%20June%202007%20Edition.pdf  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 http://www.jpands.org/vol10no2/kauffman.pdf

 Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D.
 is Professor of Chemistry Emeritus at the
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, 600 S. 43rd St., Philadelphia, PA,
19104-4495. E-mail: kauffman@hslc.org

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------